Ancient Egyptian Language: Hieroglyphs, Hieratic, & Demotic

The Ancient Egyptian Language spanned over 4,000 years, evolving significantly through five main phases: Old, Middle, Late, Demotic, and finally, Coptic. The writing systems used to record these phases are equally complex, centered on Hieroglyphs, a beautiful and highly pictorial script primarily reserved for monumental inscriptions and sacred texts. For everyday administrative and religious documents written on papyrus, the cursive Hieratic script was used, which later developed into the even more shorthand Demotic script during the Late Period. The ability to read this language was lost for over a millennium until the discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799, which provided the key needed for Jean-François Champollion to finally decode the hieroglyphs by comparing the same decree written in hieroglyphs, Demotic, and ancient Greek.

The Cradle of Written Language

The Ancient Egyptian Language is a towering monument in human communication history. It stands as one of the world’s earliest documented languages. Its antiquity spans over four millennia. This period runs from the Early Dynastic inscriptions to the sacred Coptic texts. This scope gives it a unique status among indigenous tongues. Along with Sumerian, Egyptian offers scholars an unparalleled look into the linguistic, cultural, and political growth of a great civilization.

A. Definition and Significance

The ancient Egyptian language belongs to the Afro-Asiatic language family. This group is also called Afrasian or Hamito-Semitic. This classification places Egyptian alongside several major groups. These include Semitic languages (Arabic, Hebrew), Berber languages, Cushitic languages, Omotic languages, and Chadic languages (Hausa). This common origin suggests that Egyptian civilization did not develop alone. It evolved from a shared ancestor. This provides deep historical and anthropological links across the region.

The language is vital for more than just linguistics. It is the direct key to understanding Pharaonic civilization. The language preserves details of Egyptian governance, religion, science, literature, and daily life. The hieroglyphic script dominates Egypt’s archaeological sites. Egyptians saw it as more than a writing tool. They viewed it as a divine gift, calling it mdw-nṯr (“the words of the god”). The language survived into its final Coptic phase, written with an alphabet. This ultimately provided the essential clues for its modern revival.

B. The Rosetta Stone: The Key to Modern Decipherment

Rosetta Stone Decipherment, How One Stone Unlocked Ancient Egypt's Mystery

The ability to read the sacred hieroglyphs was lost for nearly 1,500 years. This left the vast historical record of ancient Egypt silent. A single, accidental discovery finally broke this silence: the Rosetta Stone. French soldiers found it in 1799 during Napoleon’s campaign. This stone stele contained the same decree in three scripts: Hieroglyphs, Demotic (the later cursive script), and ancient Greek.

French scholar Jean-François Champollion made the decisive breakthrough in 1822. He accurately compared the known Greek text with the unknown Egyptian scripts. Champollion recognized that hieroglyphs were phonetic sounds, not just pictures. This realization unlocked the pharaohs’ entire linguistic heritage. This decipherment birthed the modern field of Egyptology. It allowed a detailed study of the language to finally begin. Decoding the Ancient Egyptian Language was the single most important event in the discipline’s history. It provided the primary source material for all subsequent historical knowledge.

C. The Scope: A 4,000-Year Linguistic Journey

The history of the Ancient Egyptian Language is a story of continuous change. Its timeline spans approximately 3400 BCE to the 17th century CE. Almost no other indigenous language matches this chronological scope. During this time, the grammar, vocabulary, and writing systems profoundly adapted. They reacted to shifting political landscapes and cultural needs. This evolution allowed the language to survive the Old Kingdom, the New Kingdom, Greek occupation, Roman rule, and the early Islamic period. It showed remarkable resilience before finally yielding to Arabic as the common spoken tongue.

FUN

Linguistic Classification and Origins

Linguistic Classification and Origins

To properly understand the Ancient Egyptian Language, one must look beyond its famous hieroglyphic appearance and examine its underlying structure—its classification, phonology, and morphology—which reveal its deepest roots and functional mechanics.

A. Afro-Asiatic Family and Sub-Grouping

As established, Egyptian is a member of the Afro-Asiatic macro-family. Within this enormous group, it occupies its own branch, suggesting that it diverged from the common ancestor very early. Its closest structural similarities often lie with the Semitic languages, particularly in its morphological system (how words are built) and some shared vocabulary roots.

For instance, like Arabic and Hebrew, Egyptian utilizes tri-consonantal roots as the core of its word formation. These three consonants carry the primary meaning, and vowels (which were typically unwritten in the earlier stages) are inserted and changed to derive different parts of speech, tenses, or voices. The existence of these shared, fundamental features strongly supports its placement within the Afro-Asiatic family and helps linguists reconstruct the ancestral proto-language.

B. Phonology: Reconstructed Sounds

The phonology (sound system) of the Ancient Egyptian Language presents unique challenges to modern scholars because the earliest writing systems did not record vowels. Furthermore, many ancient sounds have no direct equivalent in modern English or European languages. What we understand today is largely a reconstruction based on:

  1. Coptic: The final phase of the language, which used Greek letters and recorded all vowels, provides the primary reference.
  2. Transcriptions: How ancient Egyptian names were written in Akkadian, Greek, and other contemporary languages.
  3. Comparative Linguistics: Comparing the sounds with those found in related Semitic and Berber languages.

The script primarily records consonants and semi-vowels (such as w and y). The consonantal inventory included sounds familiar to English, but also specific emphatic consonants, glottal stops, and pharyngeal fricatives (sounds produced by constricting the throat), which are common in Arabic and other Afro-Asiatic languages. For example, the hieroglyphic symbol for the arm, written as ˁ, represents a pharyngeal sound.

For pronunciation by modern scholars and students, a conventional vocalization is used (often inserting an ‘e’ or ‘a’ between consonants), but this convention does not represent the actual sound of the language as spoken by Ramesses II or Tutankhamun.

C. Morphology: Roots, Patterns, and Grammar

The morphology of the Ancient Egyptian Language is highly analytical, especially in its later phases, but retains the core characteristics of the Afro-Asiatic family.

  • Roots and Patterns: As mentioned, the tri-consonantal root is essential. For example, a hypothetical root s-d-m might carry the basic meaning of ‘hear’ or ‘listen’. By applying different unwritten vowel patterns and prefixes/suffixes, the scribes would derive forms like ‘he hears,’ ‘they heard,’ or ‘hearing’ (the noun).
  • Affixation: The language uses a complex system of affixes (prefixes and suffixes) to mark grammar. These are often seen as separate particles or pronouns added to the core word. For instance, suffix pronouns were appended directly to nouns to denote possession (“his house”) or to verbs to denote the subject (“he hears”).
  • Gender and Number: All nouns in the Ancient Egyptian Language are assigned a gender: masculine or feminine. The feminine gender is typically marked by the suffix -t. Nouns also had three numbers: singular, plural, and dual (used for pairs, such as eyes, hands, or two kings).

This intricate structure shows that while the language eventually simplified its morphology, its early form was complex, requiring specialized knowledge to manipulate the system of roots and affixes correctly.

FUN

The Five Main Historical Stages

The Five Main Historical Stages

The Ancient Egyptian Language was not static; it evolved dramatically across four thousand years, mirroring the rise and fall of dynasties and the continuous transformation of Egyptian culture. Scholars categorize this evolution into five primary historical stages, each defined by distinct grammatical features, vocabulary, and literary genres.

A. Archaic Egyptian (Before 2600 BCE)

The Archaic phase represents the earliest stage of the Ancient Egyptian Language that we can partially reconstruct. It corresponds with the late Predynastic Period and the two Dynasties of the Early Dynastic Period. We know this phase primarily through the earliest surviving hieroglyphic inscriptions, which appear on funerary stelae, seals, and ceramics, such as the elaborate Naqada II ceramic vessels.

These early writings typically consist of short labels, names, titles, and brief administrative notes. They focus intensely on record-keeping and identifying ownership. While the texts are too sparse to fully map out the grammar of Archaic Egyptian, they clearly demonstrate that the fundamental principles of the hieroglyphic script—the combination of logograms (word signs) and phonograms (sound signs)—were already in place. This phase laid the linguistic foundation for the massive literary and religious output that followed.

B. Old Egyptian (2600–2000 BCE)

Old Egyptian served as the official language of the Old Kingdom and persisted through the turmoil of the First Intermediate Period. This period produced a significant expansion of the language’s attested record, notably within monumental religious architecture.

The largest and most important body of literature from this phase is the Pyramid Texts. These complex religious texts—inscribed on the interior walls of the pyramids of the Fifth and Sixth Dynasty pharaohs—detail the spells and rituals necessary to guide the deceased ruler’s spirit to the afterlife and ensure his resurrection among the stars. The language of the Pyramid Texts is dense, archaic, and often challenging to translate, reflecting the sacred and profound nature of the subject matter.

Grammatically, Old Egyptian was more conservative than later stages. The script consistently employed ideograms (pictures that represent the object itself), phonograms, and determinatives (silent signs that clarify the meaning of a word). Non-religious texts, such as tomb autobiographies and decrees, also began to appear, actively portraying the deeds and lives of important Old Kingdom officials.

C. Middle Egyptian (2000–1300 BCE)

Middle Egyptian is universally considered the Classical Egyptian Language. Although it was primarily the spoken language only during the Middle Kingdom, it gained such prestige that scribes continued to write in this dialect long after it had ceased to be vernacular—a parallel to the status of Latin in medieval Europe.

The literary breadth of Middle Egyptian is stunning. Scribes used it to create a massive corpus of diverse textual writings in both the hieroglyphic and the cursive Hieratic scripts. These texts include:

  • Mortuary Texts: The Coffin Texts, which transferred the democratization of the afterlife from the pharaoh to commoners.
  • Wisdom Literature: Philosophical and moral guides, like the Instructions of Amenemope, offering advice on how to live a virtuous life that aligned with the ancient Egyptian metaphysical concept of Maat (truth, order, balance).
  • Scientific and Medical Documents: Important works like the Edwin Smith Papyrus documented surgical procedures and anatomical knowledge.
  • Narrative Adventures: Literary works, such as The Tale of the Shipwrecked Sailor and The Story of Sinuhe, chronicled the fictionalized adventures of individuals, demonstrating the language’s capacity for complex storytelling.

Because the grammar and style of Middle Egyptian were so powerful and widely taught, it remained the standard for classical inscription for centuries, creating a deliberate archaism in later historical works.

D. Late Egyptian (1300–700 BCE)

Late Egyptian emerged during the New Kingdom, the apex of ancient Egyptian civilization, and became the language of everyday discourse. The New Kingdom was a cosmopolitan age of empire, and the language adapted, displaying a clear linguistic break from the older stages. The gap between Middle and Late Egyptian is grammatically much larger than the change observed between Old and Middle Egyptian.

Late Egyptian actively introduced new grammatical features and constructions, many of which resembled the spoken language more closely. The most noticeable shift involves the verb structure; the language began to rely less on synthetic verb forms and more on analytical constructions (using auxiliary verbs and particles). Its vocabulary also absorbed numerous loanwords, particularly from Semitic languages, due to Egypt’s extensive military and trade involvement in the Near East.

The literary output of this period is rich in both historical and creative works, including detailed accounts of major military campaigns (like the battles of Kadesh and the Delta), secular poetry, love songs, and complex spiritual passages. Scribes often intentionally mixed Late Egyptian with older classical forms, creating classicisms in historical and literary works to elevate their status, while the hieroglyphic orthography itself underwent a massive increase in its graphemic inventory (the number of available signs).

E. Demotic and Coptic (600 BCE – 17th Century CE)

The final two stages of the Ancient Egyptian Language saw dramatic changes, influenced heavily by foreign rule and the rise of Christianity.

1. Demotic Language (600 BCE – 400 CE):

Demotic (meaning ‘popular’) was the vernacular language and highly cursive script of the Late and Ptolemaic periods, lasting for about 1,000 years. It evolved directly from the northern forms of the Hieratic script.

  • The Early Demotic Language (650–400 BCE): This phase was primarily used for administrative, legal, and commercial writings, especially during the 26th Dynasty.
  • The Middle Demotic Language (400–30 BCE): This stage saw widespread use for literary and religious compositions. However, the government officially adopted Greek as the language of administration following Alexander the Great’s conquest.
  • Late Roman Demotic (30 BCE – 400 CE): Demotic texts began to decline as Greek dominance increased. Nonetheless, important religious works and temple graffiti, like the inscriptions on the temple walls of Goddess Isis on Philae, still attest to its use during the Roman era.
2. Coptic Language (200 – 1100 CE and beyond):

Coptic is the direct, last descendant of the Ancient Egyptian Language. It represents the definitive culmination of the linguistic transition, primarily serving as the official language from 200 CE onward. Crucially, Coptic abandoned the complex logographic and syllabic structures of earlier scripts and was written using a system based on the Greek alphabet, supplemented by seven extra letters borrowed from the Demotic script to represent sounds Greek lacked. Coptic was actively spoken until the 17th century. Today, it survives as the sacred liturgical language of the Coptic Orthodox Church, preserving the historical sounds and forms of the language for modern study.

The Profound Egyptian Influence on Greek Civilization

Egypt profoundly influenced ancient Greek civilization in various aspects. Key influences include religious syncretism, with...
Related post
FUN

The Writing Systems: From Picture to Alphabet

The Writing Systems; From Picture to Alphabet

The Ancient Egyptian Language employed a diverse array of writing systems throughout its history. Unlike modern languages that usually rely on a single primary script, Egyptian scribes mastered several distinct forms, choosing the appropriate script based on the medium, the subject matter, and the speed required for the task. This evolution reflects a movement from highly pictorial, monumental scripts to rapidly written, simplified cursive systems, eventually culminating in a fully alphabetic script.

A. Hieroglyphs: The Sacred Script (mdw-nṯr)

The term Hieroglyphs literally translates from Greek as “sacred carvings” or “god’s words” (mdw-nṯr in Egyptian), accurately reflecting their primary function. Egyptians typically reserved this elaborate script for monumental contexts: carved into the stone of temples, painted on tomb walls, and inscribed on sarcophagi. Hieroglyphs offered immense aesthetic and religious power, often acting as living images that contained inherent magic.

Scribes constructed Hieroglyphic writing through three fundamental types of signs, which they combined flexibly within imaginary squares called quadrats:

  1. Logograms (or Ideograms): A sign represents the object it depicts. For instance, the image of a sun disk (odot) denotes the word for ‘sun’ or the god Ra.

  2. Phonograms: These signs represent one or more sounds, functioning like letters or syllables.

    • Uniliteral Signs: Represent a single consonant (the basis of the Ancient Egyptian Alphabet).

    • Biliteral and Triliteral Signs: Represent sequences of two or three consonants (e.g., pr for ‘house’ or nfr for ‘good’).

  3. Determinatives: These signs carried no phonetic value but provided crucial context, clarifying the meaning of the preceding word. For example, after writing the sounds for a word like ‘walk,’ the scribe added a determinative depicting a pair of legs to ensure the reader correctly identified the word as relating to motion, rather than a similarly spelled, abstract noun.

Scribes also mastered the complex fluidity of the script. They could write hieroglyphs from right to left, left to right, or even in vertical columns. The direction of reading was always indicated by the figures of animals and people: readers faced the direction that the signs faced.

B. Hieratic: The Priestly Script

As the Egyptian state grew and administration became more complex during the Old Kingdom, the intricate process of carving or painting hieroglyphs became too slow for daily use. This practical need led to the development of Hieratic.

Hieratic is a highly cursive, simplified form of hieroglyphs. It functioned as the dominant script for administrative, legal, mathematical, medical, and literary texts. While hieroglyphs retained their association with monumental permanence, Hieratic became the workhorse script, written rapidly in ink using a reed pen on papyrus or ostraca (pottery shards and limestone flakes).

The fundamental structure of the language remained identical to that of the hieroglyphic texts, but the pictorial elements simplified into abstract, rounded strokes. For instance, the detailed image of an owl (the phonogram for the sound m) was reduced to a few quick, almost unrecognizable lines in Hieratic. Unlike the flexible directionality of hieroglyphs, scribes strictly wrote Hieratic in horizontal lines, always from right to left.

C. Demotic: The Popular Script

A further simplification of the cursive Hieratic led to the development of Demotic (from the Greek dēmotikos, meaning ‘popular’). This script emerged in the Delta region during the 26th Dynasty (Saite Period) and became the standard vernacular script for the late periods of Egyptian history, covering the Persian, Ptolemaic, and early Roman eras.

Demotic is an extreme form of shorthand. Its signs are so highly abstracted that they bear little visual resemblance to the original hieroglyphs. It was the script of the people and the law courts, handling commercial contracts, personal letters, and wills. The extensive use of ligatures (where signs are joined together) and complex orthography make Demotic notoriously difficult for modern scholars to read and transcribe.

The importance of Demotic cannot be overstated, as it served as one of the three scripts on the Rosetta Stone, providing the linguistic link between the older Egyptian scripts and the known Greek script, ultimately enabling Champollion’s decipherment.

D. Coptic: The Alphabetic Script

The final stage in the evolution of the Egyptian script is Coptic. The rise of Christianity in Egypt and the increasing dominance of Greek as the administrative language necessitated a writing system that could accurately record all the sounds, including vowels, of the final spoken version of the Egyptian language.

Coptic is revolutionary because it abandons the logo-syllabic complexity of all previous native Egyptian scripts. Instead, it relies almost entirely on the Greek alphabet (24 letters). To represent sounds present in Egyptian but absent in Greek (such as sh or f), scribes added seven extra letters borrowed directly from the older Demotic script.

Coptic’s phonetic precision provides the single most important resource for reconstructing the pronunciation of the earlier, vowel-less forms of the Ancient Egyptian Language. While the Coptic language is the direct descendant of Pharaonic Egyptian, the Coptic script is a powerful hybrid that successfully preserved the indigenous language for nearly two millennia, allowing it to survive today as the sacred language of the Coptic Orthodox Church.

Ancient Egyptian Mummies: From Pharaohs to Powdered Medicine

This article explores the dark, two-sided history of Ancient Egyptian Mummies. Discover the staggering scale...
Related post
FUN

Grammar and Syntax

Grammar and Syntax of the ancient Egyptian Language

The grammar of the Ancient Egyptian Language offers a fascinating study in linguistic evolution. While its structure shares common features with other Afro-Asiatic languages, it developed unique syntactical rules that defined how Egyptians constructed meaning. Understanding this structure is essential for accurately translating and interpreting Pharaonic texts.

A. Word Order: Verb-Subject-Object (VSO) Structure

In its classical form (Middle Egyptian), the Ancient Egyptian Language primarily employed a Verb-Subject-Object (VSO) word order for simple declarative sentences. This means the action or state typically precedes the person or thing performing the action. This structure is found in Semitic languages like classical Arabic and Hebrew, but contrasts sharply with the Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) order common in English.

For example, a sentence reading “The Pharaoh built the temple” would be structured in Middle Egyptian as: ỉr-n s-t n-p-r

Literally: “Made (verb) the Pharaoh (subject) the temple (object).”

As the language evolved, particularly into the Late Egyptian phase, the structure became more analytical and flexible, sometimes approximating an SVO or even VOS structure, often utilizing auxiliary particles and verbs to clarify tense and aspect.

B. Nouns, Adjectives, and Number

The inflection of nouns and adjectives followed strict rules concerning gender and number:

  1. Gender: Every noun was designated as either masculine or feminine. Scribes marked feminine nouns by the suffix -t at the end of the word, often pronounced as an -e sound in the conventional vocalization. For example, sn meant ‘brother’ (masculine), while sn.t meant ‘sister’ (feminine). Adjectives also agreed with the noun they modified in gender.

  2. Number: The language possessed three grammatical numbers:

  • Singular: The base form of the noun.
  • Plural: Indicated by the suffix -w or -wt and marked visually by writing the noun three times or adding three vertical strokes (III}) or three coils of rope (nnn) after the word.
  • Dual: Used exclusively for objects or entities that naturally occurred in pairs (e.g., eyes, hands, a pair of sandals, or two rulers). Scribes marked the dual by the suffix –wy and two strokes (II).

C. Verbs: Aspect Over Tense

The verbal system of the Ancient Egyptian Language is highly complex, defining actions based on aspect rather than tense. Unlike English, which focuses on when the action occurred (past, present, future), Egyptian verbs emphasize the type or quality of the action—whether it was completed, habitual, or ongoing.

Key verbal forms included:

  • Suffix Conjugation: The classic verbal form in Middle Egyptian. Scribes created it by suffixing pronouns directly to the verb stem, which typically denoted a completed action (like the past tense in English).
  • Pseudoverbal Constructions: These became increasingly important in Late Egyptian. The construction used an auxiliary verb (a verb like ‘to be’ or ‘to do’) combined with an infinitive or stative form of the main verb. This allowed the language to more clearly express continuous or habitual actions.
  • The Stative (or Old Perfective): This special verbal form describes a state or condition resulting from a previous action, such as “he is seated” or “the door is open.”

D. Pronouns and Nominal Sentences

The language utilizes a sophisticated system of pronouns, each serving a distinct grammatical function:

  1. Suffix Pronouns: The most common set. Scribes attached them to nouns (to show possession: ‘his house’), to prepositions, and to the Suffix Conjugation verbs (to show the subject: ‘he heard’).
  2. Dependent Pronouns: These always follow the word they modify, functioning as the object of a verb or preposition.
  3. Independent Pronouns: These stood alone, primarily used to express emphasis or as the subject of a Nominal Sentence.

Nominal Sentences are a unique and important feature of Ancient Egyptian Language. They are sentences that do not contain a verb; instead, they equate two nouns or a noun and an adjective using implied forms of the verb “to be.” For example, a nominal sentence simply reading “The king good” translates as “The king is good.” This form was prevalent for stating facts, titles, and definitions.

The Middle Kingdom of Egypt: The Complete History of the Classical Age

Discover the Middle Kingdom, often called Egypt’s "Classical Age" of culture and stability (c. 2055–1650...
Related post
FUN

Cultural Significance and Legacy

Cultural Significance and Legacy of the ancient Egyptian language

The Ancient Egyptian Language was more than a means of communication; it was an integral pillar of the Egyptian worldview, bureaucracy, and religious practice, ensuring the continuity of the civilization for thousands of years.

A. The Purpose of Writing: Commemoration, Magic, and Eternity

Egyptians viewed their written language, particularly hieroglyphs, as having intrinsic magical power. Inscribing a name in hieroglyphs meant guaranteeing that person’s existence in the afterlife—it literally made them immortal. Similarly, writing down a spell or ritual effectively brought that ritual to life. This explains the meticulous care scribes took with temple and tomb inscriptions; the writing itself served the crucial function of commemoration and ensuring eternity. The placement of certain menacing determinatives in a private tomb could act as a curse against intruders, showing the power inherent in the written word.

B. The Role of the Scribe: The Elite Class

The complexity of the Ancient Egyptian Language—managing four scripts and intricate grammar—ensured that literacy remained the domain of a highly powerful and privileged elite: the Scribes. Scribes held positions of immense power in administration, the military, the priesthood, and tax collection. They were exempt from manual labor and celebrated in wisdom texts that extolled the virtues of their profession, stating that “The scribe directs the work of all.” The ability to read and write was the single most reliable path to social mobility and success in Pharaonic society.

C. Modern Survival and Influence

Although Arabic gradually replaced the spoken vernacular of Egyptian after the 7th century CE, the legacy of the Ancient Egyptian Language endures.

  1. Coptic Survival: The Coptic language remains in use today as the essential liturgical language of the Coptic Orthodox Church, preserving the final phase of the language’s phonetics and vocabulary.
  2. Linguistic Influence: The language’s structure provides unique data for Afro-Asiatic comparative linguistics.
  3. Cultural Impact: The visual grandeur of the hieroglyphs continues to captivate the world, defining the popular image of ancient Egypt. The successful decipherment of the language via the Rosetta Stone remains a celebrated achievement of modern scholarship, ensuring that the words of the pharaohs will never again fall silent.
Explore Pyramids, Luxor, the black & white desert, and more...
Wonderful adventure trip to Egypt. Visit the best ancient Egyptian landmarks....

Big tick off our bucket list!

Booked the evening before and were able to do everything we hoped to in a day, with a knowledgeable guide & at a reasonable price! Lunch was included and absolutely delicious! Learnt about the history of Egypt, which was the most important part of sightseeing in Cairo/Giza. Hamada also gave

More »

AMAZING TOUR, SOLO TRAVELER.

I am a California woman who traveled to Egypt alone, and thanks to Egypt Fun Tours, I had a great time. Hani, Mohammed, Kamal, and David (my driver) were very professional and very knowledgeable. I appreciate how respectful they were and how protective they were of me. They showed me

More »

Perfect layover Tour

I had a 10 hour layover in Cairo so booked a tour with Hani at Egypt Fun Tours. The tour was brilliant. I saw exactly what I wanted to see during the day which included the pyramids, Sphinx, Egyptian museum and the Bazaar. Hani was very knowledgeable and was the

More »

Day Trip to Alexandria

An enjoyable drive from Cairo to Alexandria. It was an enriching trip. I learnt so much history about the ancient civilisation. The tour guide explained the history of each site we visited. There is so much to see. I would definitely highly recommend visiting Alexandria. It’s rich in history. The

More »
Isis with wings

Top-rated Tour Packages

Isis with wings